Project

General

Profile

Bug #8961

Pink areas in HDR from Canon 600D

Added by Ladislav Ezr almost 7 years ago. Updated almost 5 years ago.

Status:
Fixed
Priority:
Medium
Category:
Lighttable
Target version:
Start date:
09/30/2012
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Affected Version:
1.0.5
System:
Ubuntu
bitness:
64-bit
hardware architecture:
amd64/x86

Description

When creating HDR from 3 .RAW from Canon 600D, the .DNG have ping instead of highlights and the white.

(Please note that these pictures are copyright protected, use them for development purposes only. Thank you)

IMG_5081.jpg (347 KB) IMG_5081.jpg 3rd photo Ladislav Ezr, 09/30/2012 10:35 AM
IMG_5080.jpg (249 KB) IMG_5080.jpg 2nd photo Ladislav Ezr, 09/30/2012 10:35 AM
IMG_5079.jpg (323 KB) IMG_5079.jpg 1st photo Ladislav Ezr, 09/30/2012 10:35 AM
IMG_5079-hdr.jpg (330 KB) IMG_5079-hdr.jpg Exported HDR Ladislav Ezr, 09/30/2012 10:35 AM

Related issues

Related to darktable - Bug #10105: darktable creates bad HDR image Fixed09/09/2014

History

#1 Updated by Johannes Hanika almost 7 years ago

did you try git/unstable ppa with these images? the jpg are unfortunately not helping to reproduce the issue on dev side. there have been some changes to that code in the last couple of weeks.

#2 Updated by Ladislav Ezr almost 7 years ago

Johannes Hanika wrote:

did you try git/unstable ppa with these images? the jpg are unfortunately not helping to reproduce the issue on dev side. there have been some changes to that code in the last couple of weeks.

Ok, I will try the git PPA and report back with uploaded .raw images :)

#3 Updated by Tobias Ellinghaus almost 7 years ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 20
  • Priority changed from High to Medium
  • Assignee deleted (Developers)
  • Status changed from New to Incomplete

#4 Updated by Ladislav Ezr almost 7 years ago

Johannes Hanika wrote:

did you try git/unstable ppa with these images? the jpg are unfortunately not helping to reproduce the issue on dev side. there have been some changes to that code in the last couple of weeks.

So I installed the git version from PPA and it's still the same. Should I upload the .raw images?

#5 Updated by Fabien Rousseau over 6 years ago

Hello,

I also got this issue when trying to profile my Nikon D5100 for the new denoise module...

The raw image is composed of a dark zone and a light bulb
When importing it into darktable :
- If no module is selected/enabled : the light bulb is pink
- If the module "base_curve" or "highlight reconstruction" is enabled, then the light bulb appears correctly...
(I tried enabling a few others, but light bulb was still more or less pink...)
It seems to appears on over-saturated parts of the photo.

If it can help, I uploaded the raw file + exports on this url : http://fabiphoto.free.fr/darktable/darktable_pink.tar.gz

Note : darktable was built from git repo (last commit : a113cdb)

#6 Updated by Tobias Ellinghaus almost 6 years ago

  • System set to Ubuntu

Any news on this one? I think I can remember some issues with our HDR creation code. No idea what the current state is though.

#7 Updated by Ladislav Ezr almost 6 years ago

Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:

Any news on this one? I think I can remember some issues with our HDR creation code. No idea what the current state is though.

I still can reproduce it.

#8 Updated by Tobias Ellinghaus almost 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Incomplete to Triaged

With what version did you test?

#9 Updated by Ladislav Ezr almost 6 years ago

Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:

With what version did you test?

The lates stable (1.2.3).

#10 Updated by Roman Lebedev about 5 years ago

  • Related to Bug #10105: darktable creates bad HDR image added

#11 Updated by Roman Lebedev almost 5 years ago

  • bitness set to 64-bit
  • % Done changed from 20 to 100
  • Assignee set to Johannes Hanika
  • Status changed from Triaged to Fixed

There were some changes in the HDR merging code, so hopefully this is fixed.
Could you please test and report any (new?) issues if you could find them.

Also available in: Atom PDF

Go to top