Project

General

Profile

Camera Support #11950

Panasonic DMC-ZS100 raw support

Added by David Gasaway 11 months ago. Updated 11 months ago.

Status:
Fixed
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
Category:
-
Target version:
Start date:
01/20/2018
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Affected Version:
2.4.0

Description

Even though the DMC-TZ100 is apparently supported, I can't get darktable to read raw files from my DMC-ZS100 (US version of DMC-TZ100/DMC-TZ110). I thought support was going to land with 2.4.0, but it's still not working. I submitted a full set of raws to raw.pixls.us, I think in May 2017. dcraw can decode the files (Camera: Panasonic DMC-ZS100). DMC-TZ100 is listed on the lensfun coverage list. Still I just get "file has unknown format!" when trying to add a file to the lighttable, and "failed to read camera white balance information" when trying to open it in darkroom. Below is the console output. I'd be happy to help.

(darktable:18340): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_set_data: assertion 'G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed

(darktable:18340): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_get_has_tooltip: assertion 'GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed
RW2 IMAGE
RW2 IMAGE
RW2 IMAGE
RawSpeed:Unable to find camera in database: 'Panasonic' 'DMC-ZS100' ''
Please consider providing samples on <https://raw.pixls.us/>, thanks!
[rawspeed] (P1000678.rw2) bool rawspeed::RawDecoder::checkCameraSupported(const rawspeed::CameraMetaData*, const string&, const string&, const string&), line 180: Camera 'Panasonic' 'DMC-ZS100', mode '' not supported, and not allowed to guess. Sorry.
RW2 IMAGE
[temperature] failed to read camera white balance information from `P1000678.rw2'!
[temperature] `Panasonic DMC-ZS100' color matrix not found for image
[temperature] failed to read camera white balance information from `P1000678.rw2'!
RW2 IMAGE

Associated revisions

Revision fd1ae360
Added by Roman Lebedev 11 months ago

RawSpeed submodule update: some camera support & related fixes.

Fixes #11950.
Fixes #11955.
Fixes #11957.

History

#1 Updated by Roman Lebedev 11 months ago

  • % Done changed from 0 to 20
  • Status changed from New to Incomplete

David Gasaway wrote:

Even though the DMC-TZ100 is apparently supported, I can't get darktable to read raw files from my

DMC-ZS100 (US version of DMC-TZ100/DMC-TZ110). I thought support was going to land with 2.4.0, but it's still not working.

Why?
That camera is not listed on https://www.darktable.org/resources/camera-support/

I submitted a full set of raws to raw.pixls.us, I think in May 2017.

Uhm, for DMC-ZS100?
There are no samples for that camera there.
I won't be able to recall if there was a submission, and why it did not get through.

dcraw can decode the files (Camera: Panasonic DMC-ZS100). DMC-TZ100 is listed on the lensfun coverage list. Still I just get "file has unknown format!" when trying to add a file to the lighttable, and "failed to read camera white balance information" when trying to open it in darkroom. Below is the console output. I'd be happy to help.

Please submit the full raw sample set to PRU.

#2 Updated by David Gasaway 11 months ago

Roman Lebedev wrote:

Why?

Why did I think it would work in 2.4.0? Because I had uploaded the raws, they seemed to be sorted/filed when I checked back later, and it's essentially the same camera as the DMC-TZ100. :)

There are no samples for that camera there.
I won't be able to recall if there was a submission, and why it did not get through.
Please submit the full raw sample set to PRU.

I still have the original set, but I went ahead and uploaded a new set.

Thanks.

#3 Updated by David Gasaway 11 months ago

Also, please let me know if there is anything I can do for lens correction, noise profile, etc.

#4 Updated by Roman Lebedev 11 months ago

David Gasaway wrote:

Roman Lebedev wrote:

Why?

Why did I think it would work in 2.4.0? Because I had uploaded the raws, they seemed to be sorted/filed when I checked back later, and it's essentially the same camera as the DMC-TZ100. :)

If there is no reported, filled issue, then there is no bug / camera support request / etc.

#5 Updated by Roman Lebedev 11 months ago

David Gasaway wrote:

Also, please let me know if there is anything I can do for lens correction, noise profile, etc.

lens correction is lensfun.
noise profile - see blogpost, it should still be valid.

#6 Updated by Roman Lebedev 11 months ago

  • Status changed from Incomplete to In Progress
  • % Done changed from 20 to 50
  • Assignee set to Roman Lebedev

#7 Updated by Roman Lebedev 11 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Fixed
  • % Done changed from 50 to 100

#8 Updated by Roman Lebedev 11 months ago

  • Target version set to 2.6.0

#9 Updated by David Gasaway 11 months ago

Roman Lebedev wrote:

If there is no reported, filled issue, then there is no bug / camera support request / etc.

Sorry. If there were instructions to create an issue at the time of the first upload, I must have missed it. My bad.

junkyardsparkle suggested I ask whether this will be included in the next 2.4.x release?

#10 Updated by Roman Lebedev 11 months ago

David Gasaway wrote:

Roman Lebedev wrote:

If there is no reported, filled issue, then there is no bug / camera support request / etc.

Sorry. If there were instructions to create an issue at the time of the first upload, I must have missed it. My bad.

junkyardsparkle suggested I ask whether this will be included in the next 2.4.x release?

If there will be next point release, it should be included.

Also available in: Atom PDF