Project

General

Profile

Feature #10815

Noise Profile Canon PoerShot SX510 HS

Added by Joe Giampaoli about 4 years ago. Updated over 3 years ago.

Status:
Fixed
Priority:
Low
Assignee:
-
Category:
General
Target version:
Start date:
12/26/2015
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Affected Version:
2.0.0
System:
Debian
bitness:
64-bit
hardware architecture:
amd64/x86

Description

I had deleted all my config files to start out a clean and fresh environment on DT. Since I had profiled this camera it was previously using the profiles included in the db in my config files (locally). When starting from zero I saw that the noise profiles were not being detected by DT. I took a look at noiseprofiles.json file and wondered why it wasn't loading them, clearly my profiles are there. I tested adding just the word "Canon" to the lines and now it loads them without any issues.

Attaching edited .json if you want to update it.

Thanks

noiseprofiles.json (675 KB) noiseprofiles.json Joe Giampaoli, 12/26/2015 12:28 AM

Associated revisions

Revision 0f2b8399 (diff)
Added by Pedro Côrte-Real about 4 years ago

rawspeed: add defs for Canon CHDK DNG cameras

rawspeed doesn't need these entries to process the dngs
but since we also use it to get clean names this makes
sure these cameras have naming consistent with other
Canon cameras. Also fixes #10815.

Revision 0aadf001 (diff)
Added by Pedro Côrte-Real about 4 years ago

rawspeed: add defs for Canon CHDK DNG cameras

rawspeed doesn't need these entries to process the dngs
but since we also use it to get clean names this makes
sure these cameras have naming consistent with other
Canon cameras. Also fixes #10815.

History

#1 Updated by Pedro Côrte-Real about 4 years ago

Thanks for bringing this up. The noise profile is actually correct (it's the same as all the other cameras) it's rawspeed that was missing a definition for that camera so as to munge up the name into the correct form. It's fixed in master now and should be part of the next release.

#2 Updated by Pedro Côrte-Real about 4 years ago

  • % Done changed from 70 to 100
  • Status changed from Patch attached to Fixed

#3 Updated by Joe Giampaoli about 4 years ago

Pedro Côrte-Real wrote:

Thanks for bringing this up. The noise profile is actually correct (it's the same as all the other cameras) it's rawspeed that was missing a definition for that camera so as to munge up the name into the correct form. It's fixed in master now and should be part of the next release.

Oh I see! OK, thanks to you! Happy Holidays!

#4 Updated by Roman Lebedev over 3 years ago

  • Target version set to 2.2.0

Also available in: Atom PDF

Go to top