Project

General

Profile

Bug #10093

Gray line appears in horizontal images when in DR and when exported

Added by Victor B almost 5 years ago. Updated over 4 years ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Low
Category:
-
Target version:
-
Start date:
09/03/2014
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Affected Version:
1.4.2
System:
Ubuntu
bitness:
64-bit
hardware architecture:
amd64/x86

Description

Horizontal images that aren't cropped on the right side gets a vertical line to the right. It doesn't help to play with the max size for the export. The vertical line appears in both exported JPEGs and in Darkroom (DR). See the attached images for more clues.

Screenshot from 2014-09-03 21_13_35.png (505 KB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 10:29 PM

Screenshot from 2014-09-03 21_14_30.png (7.84 KB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 10:29 PM

Screenshot from 2014-09-03 21_14_00.png (512 KB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 10:29 PM

Screenshot from 2014-09-03 21_14_55.png (7.57 KB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 10:29 PM

Screenshot from 2014-09-03 21_22_55.png (71.9 KB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 10:29 PM

Screenshot from 2014-09-03 21_22_17.png (467 KB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 10:29 PM

Screenshot from 2014-09-03 21_23_09.png (48.5 KB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 10:29 PM

P8230014.ORF.xmp (5.8 KB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 11:11 PM

P8230014.ORF (13.8 MB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 11:11 PM

P8310006.ORF.xmp (5.08 KB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 11:54 PM

P8310006-from-Camera.JPG (2.97 MB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 11:54 PM

P8310006.ORF (13.5 MB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 11:54 PM

P8310006-from-DT.jpg (15.6 MB) Victor B, 09/03/2014 11:54 PM

P9040080.ORF.xmp (5.08 KB) Victor B, 09/04/2014 11:31 PM

P9040080-from-camera.JPG (3.4 MB) Victor B, 09/04/2014 11:31 PM

P9040080.ORF (13.4 MB) Victor B, 09/04/2014 11:31 PM

P9040080-from-DT.jpg (18.3 MB) Victor B, 09/04/2014 11:31 PM

P9160180.ORF.xmp (5.08 KB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:52 PM

P9160180-from-camera.JPG (3.43 MB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:52 PM

P9160180.ORF (14.6 MB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:52 PM

P9160180-from-DT.jpg (24.9 MB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:52 PM

P9160181.ORF.xmp (5.08 KB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:52 PM

P9160181.ORF (14.4 MB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:52 PM

P9160181-from-camera.JPG (3.27 MB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:52 PM

P9160181-from-DT.jpg (21.3 MB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:53 PM

P9160182.ORF.xmp (5.08 KB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:53 PM

P9160182.ORF (15.8 MB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:53 PM

P9160182-from-camera.JPG (3.37 MB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:54 PM

P9160183.ORF (15.1 MB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:54 PM

P9160183.ORF.xmp (5.08 KB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:54 PM

P9160182-from-DT.jpg (28.4 MB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:54 PM

P9160183-from-camera.JPG (3.32 MB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:54 PM

P9160183-from-DT.jpg (27.7 MB) Victor B, 09/16/2014 07:54 PM

History

#1 Updated by Victor B almost 5 years ago

#2 Updated by Pascal de Bruijn almost 5 years ago

  • Priority changed from Critical to Low

The rawspeed cropbox probably needs adjusting.

Do you have a RAW+JPG (full-res) example?

#3 Updated by Victor B almost 5 years ago

Pascal de Bruijn wrote:

The rawspeed cropbox probably needs adjusting.

Do you have a RAW+JPG (full-res) example?

#4 Updated by Pascal de Bruijn almost 5 years ago

  • Assignee set to Pascal de Bruijn

#5 Updated by Pascal de Bruijn almost 5 years ago

Thanks, that gives me a general impression what needs to happen, but it's too unsharp to do the final work. I really need a tack sharp image preferably with lots of details.

#6 Updated by Victor B almost 5 years ago

Pascal de Bruijn wrote:

Thanks, that gives me a general impression what needs to happen, but it's too unsharp to do the final work. I really need a tack sharp image preferably with lots of details.

Does this one work? I don't think this one contains the line. This might be because of the image being a bit gray or something else.

#7 Updated by Pascal de Bruijn almost 5 years ago

Ok, so that's much better indeed, thought I still have the impression I'm off by 1px (I'm getting 9,9,23,7 while I think it should probably be 8,8,24,8)... I can't tell if I'm right because it still has lens correction enabled for the camera JPEG... It is possible to turn off for this body? If so, could you shoot yet another (similar) sample with lens correction turned off?

#8 Updated by Victor B almost 5 years ago

Pascal de Bruijn wrote:

Ok, so that's much better indeed, thought I still have the impression I'm off by 1px (I'm getting 9,9,23,7 while I think it should probably be 8,8,24,8)... I can't tell if I'm right because it still has lens correction enabled for the camera JPEG... It is possible to turn off for this body? If so, could you shoot yet another (similar) sample with lens correction turned off?

I cannot find any setting for the possible in-camera lens correction. I attach a few more photos for you to play with.

#9 Updated by Victor B almost 5 years ago

Victor B wrote:

Pascal de Bruijn wrote:

Ok, so that's much better indeed, thought I still have the impression I'm off by 1px (I'm getting 9,9,23,7 while I think it should probably be 8,8,24,8)... I can't tell if I'm right because it still has lens correction enabled for the camera JPEG... It is possible to turn off for this body? If so, could you shoot yet another (similar) sample with lens correction turned off?

I cannot find any setting for the possible in-camera lens correction. I attach a few more photos for you to play with.

And the last files.

#10 Updated by Victor B over 4 years ago

Victor B wrote:

Victor B wrote:

Pascal de Bruijn wrote:

Ok, so that's much better indeed, thought I still have the impression I'm off by 1px (I'm getting 9,9,23,7 while I think it should probably be 8,8,24,8)... I can't tell if I'm right because it still has lens correction enabled for the camera JPEG... It is possible to turn off for this body? If so, could you shoot yet another (similar) sample with lens correction turned off?

I cannot find any setting for the possible in-camera lens correction. I attach a few more photos for you to play with.

And the last files.

Hi Pascal

What's the forecast for this bug? I got the impression you were a few clicks away from solving it.

Also available in: Atom PDF